The Shell

img_1076
Around the 12th century the representation of the shell came to symbolize Christian pilgrims, or the pilgrimage itself within Europe to Santiago de Compostela in Spain.  Not being a scholar in these matters, I can only point to others’ research on medieval pilgrims and interesting theories speculating how they came to be.

It was in Autun, France, where  a sculpture at the cathedral marks the shell’s first appearance in art, or so it is said. I saw Autun last month, and also Vezelay, where pilgrimages to Spain tended to begin for the people who then inhabited or passed through France. Today in Vezelay, the home of what are purported to be the remains of Mary Magdalene,  shiny casts of the shell embedded in the road mark the way to Spain.

Pilgrims, and crusaders, were some of the earliest tourists.  One can make a case for the 15th century Iberian navigators being their descendants, even if their voyages seemed to be guided more overtly by an economic motive. They were claiming New World lands for king and God probably in that order.  The truth is medieval pilgrimages were also conflict-prone economic activities from the beginning: collections were forcibly taken to fund journeys; industries arose to sustain or exploit the travellers along the routes; destinations benefited by raised prices from the influx of common and noble folk.  Towns became so dependent on pilgrimages that wars were even fought over the real and ersatz holy relics that attracted worshippers. Massive cathedrals were built to house the relics, the construction of which also generated income for decades.

There are still pilgrims today, the large numbers of them outside Christendom, and the pilgrimages that are no less conflict-free.

img_1382 And here we are in 2008 in the era of mass tourism, of which I am a guilty more-than-willing participant. It has only been possible because of leisure time, big airplanes and cheap energy. In 2007, tourism was a  $856 billion global industry.

Instead of being attracted by sacred relics to purify our souls, we are drawn to experiences that will transform our earthly lives.  They are secular pilgrimages but for some of us no less a calling .

Posted in Travel, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Winter scenes

img_1383

Husband exclaimed tonight: “We have a really good life.” True.  The sky gave us a puffy pink sunset, toe-tapping jazz is playing, the embers of the fire are glowing, the Christmas tree is trimmed, the polenta is creamy, all while the warm memory of our day at the farmer’s market in the winter sun  lingers.  How could it get any better than this?

img_13872

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Thanks

overhead_abaya_ha312

I am thankful I was able to get an education without the risk of acid in my face for doing so.

I am thankful I was free to marry who I chose.

I am thankful I can leave the house without wearing a tent or veil.

I am happy I can sing, eat ice cream and dance without the risk of being lashed or stoned to death.

I am happy and reassured to know if I am widowed, I have options beyond begging on the street.

I am happy I can dress in a way that allows me to feel wind and heat on my skin.

And I am thankful for so many other things.

I am happy I have the right to vote.

I am happy my country is back.

I am happy we can start to think about healing the scars of slavery.

I am happy my family is free of debt.

I am happy we are blessed with good health.

I am happy to be blessed with food, water and shelter.

I am happy to be blessed with friends and family.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Furthermore, Barack Obama: how he will disappoint

Just for the record, I have already voted for the Obama-Biden ticket and could not be happier to have done so. My response to the neighborhood creep who takes down Democrat campaign yard signs — the hand made Obama in lights limewire — is turned on every night. So I don’t mean to be negative with these two posts.

I just don’t see attention being paid to how Obama is most definitely not ultra-liberal, despite what the right wing likes to say.  The Obama campaign probably does not want too much scrutiny on positions that could divide the left, but what would be far worse is for people to be surprised or to feel deluded post-victory.  What concerns me is that all this information is available for anyone who listens to what Obama says, but it doesn’t sink in because TV doesn’t point it out. When TV land finally does, watch out.

Faith. Every American, and that includes Presidents, has the right to their religious beliefs.  However, George W. Bush has deliberately blurred the line between church and state. Obama will not roll that back entirely. He supports government funding of faith-based groups. The difference is that he will require these groups to hire outside their faith in order to receive government funds, an improvement over Bush policy but certainly a far too cozy embrace of religion for many on the left.

Taxes.  Obama may not be able to enact his tax relief for the middle class anytime soon. Folks, the country is broke. Things don’t look good for the near future.  With a true majority in Congress, he may get away with taxing the wealthy, which will make him a hero for a while. Eventually, the middle class needs to count out their extra pennies.

Military contractors.  If you’ve read “Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army” by Jeremy Scahill (I have not but my husband has and gave me a daily recounting) and media reports you will have learned that the military contractor has insinuated itself into security services inside the military and out.  It bleeds the U.S. government financially and its pattern of corrupt, sadistic practices debase the reputation of the U.S.   But their infiltration is so deep that the military has become dependent on them and could not function in Iraq without them.  Its supporters in Congress, unless they are voted out on Nov. 4, will fight any attempt by Obama to rout out the mercenaries.

Unilateral action and diplomacy. OK, much has been made of Obama’s threat to bomb Pakistan if the Pakistanis don’t remove the Taliban from their border with Afghanistan.  Of course, the U.S. is already doing this, to much criticism from the left because of its assault on a sovereign nation and the fact that the bombing raids kill many civilians for every one confirmed terrorist death.  Obama is not likely to back off the practice, if we take him at his word.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Barack Obama: how he will disappoint

For the first time in its history, the Chicago Tribune has endorsed a Democrat for President. Barack Obama has overcome yet another hurdle by demonstrating intelligence and leadership. More importantly perhaps, he has done so by overturning many contemporary tropes of political campaigns — borderline corrupt if not immoral fundraising practices, lies and deceit from the stump, pandering on platform positions, dramatic demonstrations of outraged honor. For that, he deserves respect.

My concern is that his supporters will not see past all that to think through his clearly-stated positions and consider how they verge from what we’ve come to expect from Democrats. Obama’s appeal to the consensus and to avoiding the stock in trade Democratic Party positions means he’ll have some enemies not just on the right but on the left.

Abortion
He is against abortion on demand. He favors a complete ban on third term abortions except for health and life of the mother. Surveys show among most Americans concerns about abortions grow as the fetus grows. Obama seems to be with them on this one, but perhaps not with NARAL and NOW.

Health Care
As we have heard, Obama’s plan will not provide universal health care coverage. It will however provide coverage to all children. But where does that leave us adults? Somewhere in the middle. I can’t figure out why he has taken this odd position but I suspect it has to do with cost.

Middle East Wars
Obama understands he cannot withdraw the US from Iraq if it means images of more casualties. Bush effectively kept media cameramen far from caskets and cemeteries, one reason perhaps why an impassioned public antiwar outcry never materialized. Such images would create big problems for him as would the disloyal opposition, Ralph Nadar, and the anti-war groups. Obama has talked about defocusing on Iraq and doubling down on Afghanistan, but he’ll have trouble doing so. That would mean the savings from easing down the war would not be available to pay for health care and other programs he has campaigned on.

And then there is Afghanistan. Obama is famous, as the Chicago Tribune states, for listening. Recently there have been Middle East experts cited in media articles saying not only that the Taliban are stronger than ever but that Afghanistan is “unwinnable.” So, what should be the strategy for stabilizing the area and removing the threat posed by Islamist extremists?

Race relations
While Obama has clearly identified with the African-American populace, more than with his Caucasion heritage, early polls showed poor traction among those voters. That has now changed. But Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton could very well criticize Obama if his Administration does not champion many of the causes close to African-Americans. He will receive support for social programs that extend to African-Americans and other minority groups, such as health care. But what is his position on affirmative action, for example?

Gay rights
Obama is opposed to gay marriage, while supporting civil unions. The gay rights movement says that is not enough.

Guns
Obama is not pro-gun control. He must have decided it was a no-win position. He does however draw the line somewhere. He opposes the right to own an arsenal. This may be a good middle ground for most Americans. That’s not enough for the gun control lobby (and by the way, it is anathema to the NRA).

Independents
With all the problems facing the next Administration — crumbling infrastructure, lack of health care, education reform, economic slowdown and unemployment to mention a few — any President could do a lot of harm by cutting spending. This time, the spending has got to do some good and be seen as a smart investment in the future. There will be many naysayers.

Jews
No American politician today can survive without support for Israel. But what’s an intelligent person like Obama to do about the fact that Palestinians have been schnitzeled? My guess is that he will work hard on Middle East peace talks and in the process make pro-Israel Jews very nervous.

More later.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment